Cloud · Hybrid · Repatriation
We assess, model, and migrate workloads across AWS, Azure, and on-prem — then tell you which ones actually belong there. We’re multi-vendor by design and certified across the stack, so the recommendation follows your numbers, not one platform’s incentive. You talk to an engineer who has run the migration, not a slide deck.
The premise
Lift-and-shift looks cheap in the pilot and expensive by the third invoice. Steady-state, predictable workloads — databases, VDI, large storage — often cost more in a hyperscaler than on hardware you already own, once egress and licensing land. We start from the workload, not the destination: some belong in cloud, some belong on-prem, and most enterprises are best served by a deliberate mix. We tell you which, and we show our math.
What we do
The full lifecycle — including the parts most firms skip because they don’t sell an exit.
Why our answer is different
We work across AWS, Azure, and on-prem and hold certifications in all of them — so no single platform’s margin decides your architecture. Our deliverable is a TCO you can defend to a CFO, with the uncomfortable line items included: data egress, cross-region replication, reserved-instance lock-in, and the cost of leaving. Every platform has strengths and trade-offs. Sometimes the right answer is not the cloud — or not all of it — and we’ll say so in writing.
What an engagement includes
Best for: a post-Broadcom re-platform decision, a cloud bill that keeps climbing, or a hybrid estate no one has costed honestly.
Why IITCON
A post-Broadcom VMware renewal forcing a re-platform decision? A cloud bill that keeps climbing? Start with a readiness assessment and an honest TCO — then decide with real figures.
Talk to an engineer →